Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 30 '17 at 08:09
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 177
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 341
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Nvidia(10DE 085A) 1GB
CLim: 825 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Lighting 9.93
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 8.31
8% 9.99 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 11.2
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 403
Mixed 357
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 40.6
140% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 102
108% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
162GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 81.6
Write 91.7
Mixed 94.1
67% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.21
57% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
77GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 34.4
Write 53.9
Mixed 51.3
35% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.16
45% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback