ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu CELSIUS R920power

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '20 at 14:45
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 154 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 618 56% 470 Pts	64-Core 1596 99% 1596 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.7% Very good	Lighting 103 Reflection 104 Parallax 94 84% 100 fps	MRender 87.5 Gravity 92 Splatting 75.7 69% 85.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MK001920GWJPQ 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 595GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 403 408 391 392 391 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.2% Good	Read 273 Write 334 Mixed 243 SusWrite 366 69% 304 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 16.3 55% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 261 204% 279 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 90%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2TB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 128 130 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 118 Write 119 Mixed 83 SusWrite 129 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 77%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 70.8 Write 6 Mixed 9.9 24% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B2G70DM0- 2x16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.9 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback