Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 01:35
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 63.8
38% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 278
24% 208 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.8% Good
Lighting 74.5
Reflection 96.2
Parallax 144
61% 105 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 111
Splatting 77.4
76% 94.5 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 104 117 152 62 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 436
Write 264
Mixed 366
SusWrite 146
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 12.4
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 27.5
50% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
20GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 78.5
Write 34.6
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 71.6
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
47GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 91.2
Mixed 59
SusWrite 86.5
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B2G70DM0- 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.4% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 14.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.9
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback