Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 18:17
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 486
54% 423 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 143
Parallax 123
107% 133 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 135
Splatting 108
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$88
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 236 240 234 234 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.1% Good
Read 256
Write 241
Mixed 193
SusWrite 232
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 35.2
111% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 175
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 118%
WDC WDS1 00T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
147GB free
Firmware: UH51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 24 73 53 34 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 297
Write 198
Mixed 167
SusWrite 52.4
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 7.1
37% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 75.5
DQ Write 48.1
DQ Mixed 13.3
23% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 92%
ADATA HD710 PRO 2TB
298GB free, PID a75a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 54 88 79 57 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 144
Write 127
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 67.3
110% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 53%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
924GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 99 109 108 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 101
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 106
106% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
202% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $622
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback