Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime22 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 10:01
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 45.1
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 89.5
34% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 313
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 32GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 193
Write 238
Mixed 275
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 11.3
27% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 156
121% 167 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 106%
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 54GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 167 167 167 159 146 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 25.8
Write 179
Mixed 110
SusWrite 164
28% 120 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 8.5
31% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 149
104% 132 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 26%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
3968, 8320, 32768 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 31.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback