Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 04:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 116
54% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 298
31% 251 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 74.8
58% 72.5 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 56.4
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 126 145 145 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 224
Write 92.9
Mixed 195
SusWrite 142
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 31.1
101% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 126
98% 134 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
12GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 115 114 112 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 133
Write 109
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 111
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-036.A00LF 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback