| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181004 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 22 '20 at 15:03 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
72% 127 Pts
|
53% 443 Pts
|
34% 549 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.2%
Above average
|
60% 71.2 fps
|
51% 63.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Afox M.2-2280 128G 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 255 241 197 235 170 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
66% 294 MB/s
|
100% 35.3 MB/s
|
126% 182 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
283GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 125 142 142 141 MB/s
|
91.4%
Outstanding
|
94% 130 MB/s
|
147% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung V-GeN D4S4GL26A16TS5 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
61.7%
Good
|
62% 21.6 GB/s
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
40% 98.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 833 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 163x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 85x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 83x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 104x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 50x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 42x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $231 |