ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL702VSK

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus GL702VSK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VSK
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 185 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 432 53% 406 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Asus(1043 1660) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Lighting 97.4 Reflection 114 Parallax 89.8 79% 100 fps	MRender 92.6 Gravity 85.9 Splatting 101 77% 93 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 628 628 627 626 598 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,175 Write 948 Mixed 490 SusWrite 658 182% 818 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 52.6 161% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 980 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 543 435% 629 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 254%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 250GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 74GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 205 125 128 123 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 310 Write 317 Mixed 293 SusWrite 151 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 26.9 87% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 124 87% 109 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 74%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 455GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 202 116 118 116 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 319 Write 221 Mixed 117 SusWrite 144 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 10.1 42% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 24.8 34% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 72%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 297GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 92 93 92 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 87.8 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 91.9 53% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2133, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.3% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 22.8 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 18.4 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL702VSK Builds (Compare 593 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Asus GL702VSK

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	592x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	589x
RTX 3060Nvidia $226Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	2x
RX 5500-XTAMD $217Bench 51%, 72,993 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	76x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	54x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	43x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples	164x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,747 samples	106x
AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBUnknownBench 56%, 159 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback