MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 17:22
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 659
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$267
Gigabyte(1458 37D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 113
Parallax 118
100% 118 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 107
Splatting 98.3
93% 116 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MGTEC 360GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 200 249 64 9.9 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 471
Write 420
Mixed 369
SusWrite 96.8
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 94%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 250GB
97GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 112 112 110 119 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 380
Write 353
Mixed 296
SusWrite 113
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 23.9
77% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 131
100% 135 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 74%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB
655GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 108 107 112 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 104
Write 118
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 108
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 109%
Mass Storage Device 247GB
181GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.3% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 18.4
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 11.4
23% 17 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.1
222% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D48G8G8H8US9AFRB19 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30.7
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 27.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback