Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 18:05
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 170
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 508
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01b10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 79 83 99 113 256 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
566GB free
Firmware: ELFK1N.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1978 2036 2026 2016 2049 2076 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1684
Write 2,074
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 2030
416% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 60.1
211% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 728
531% 698 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 287%
Great: 352%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$19
614GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 147 147 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 158
Write 153
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 146
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 33.5
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 25% 36 206 58 60 0" 1920 1057
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback