Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130927
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 08:08
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 204
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 394
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8431) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 11.7
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12
Splatting 13
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
558GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 348 359 340 385 371 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 280
Write 406
Mixed 349
SusWrite 358
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 40.6
136% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 67.1
126% 253 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 151 148 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 148
Mixed 102
SusWrite 149
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback