Centrium C2014-H81H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCentrium C2014-H81H3-M4  (all builds)
MotherboardCENTRIUM C2014-H81H3-M4
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 01:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 294
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 23.6
8% 15.1 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 19
Splatting 28
20% 23.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 3.3 59 11 52 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 470
Write 267
Mixed 213
SusWrite 60.2
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 17.6
78% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 30
42% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M3 320GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 46 45 43 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 54.8
Write 36
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 45.1
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C2014-H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Centrium C2014-H81H3-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback