Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C40D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '20 at 04:03
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 16.6 1-Core 22.6 2-Core 41.9 15% 27 Pts	4-Core 72 8-Core 91.6 10% 81.8 Pts	64-Core 88.1 6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA56) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 1.88 1% 2.04 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.22 2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7WD120HCFV-00003 120GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM9203Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 254 284 268 267 290 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 298 Write 278 Mixed 216 SusWrite 271 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 17.9 57% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 162 122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-020.A00LF 6GB 1600, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.77% Terrible	MC Read 4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 346 12% 346 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
240G 240GBBRBench 78%, 141 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	3x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	2x
4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 1x2GBMicronBench 17%, 1,163 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16