Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 02:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 771
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
EVGA(3842 1257) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.5% Average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 52.5
50% 56.3 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 49.7
46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPE2ME016T4 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8DV10171
SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 776 776 789 790 788 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 558
Write 780
Mixed 486
SusWrite 782
148% 652 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 52.1
208% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 1,078
731% 888 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 169%
Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-082.B00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 11.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 9.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback