HP 870-244

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 870-244  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830C
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 01:46
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 96
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 480
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 28.1
12% 25.4 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 34
Splatting 34.6
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
154GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 298 300 301 301 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 416
Mixed 348
SusWrite 312
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 36.9
133% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
661GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 541 518 541 552 559 550 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 45 42 46 40 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 13.2
Write 9.7
Mixed 21
SusWrite 44.6
16% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.1
64% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
41GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 88
Mixed 82
120% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
205% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 029E CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-244 Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP 870-244

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $429
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback