Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X11DPi-N(T)  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPi-NT
Memory737.1 GB free of 768 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 12:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5218
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 217
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 546
61% 478 Pts
64-Core 2,055
127% 2,055 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 3.5TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 638 633 641 646 636 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
141% Outstanding
Read 1,627
Write 636
Mixed 488
SusWrite 637
186% 847 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 23.5
78% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 291
216% 288 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 54 56 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 315
Write 168
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 53.3
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.3
253% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 106%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 12x31.9GB
12 of 16 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
121% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 64.1
MC Mixed 48.1
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 336%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X11DPi-N(T) Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback