Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$56
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 486
65% 486 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 61.4
40% 47.6 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 40
33% 39.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 297 297 296 291 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 320
Mixed 293
SusWrite 296
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 43.4
177% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 248
212% 312 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 496GB
199GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 384 314 305 357 350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 486
Mixed 409
SusWrite 354
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 64.3
218% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
227GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 81 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 81
Write 65.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 76.8
91% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 24.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 48.1
83% 48.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback