PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101029 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 27 '20 at 10:42 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | ALB-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
11%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$180
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LADi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 87 68 119 121 MB/s
|
46.7%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
56GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 166 208 215 204 206 MB/s
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
Hds723030ala640 RSD HUA 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MKAOA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 131 138 137 137 138 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
16GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 12 11 5.7 MB/s
|
7.48%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA MQ04ABD200 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 15 15 21 15 20 MB/s
|
9.59%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
20.9%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 536x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 489x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 273x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 156x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |