Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime13 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 21:48
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 398
48% 370 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 115
Parallax 107
84% 108 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 100
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 291 298 271 266 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 374
Mixed 233
SusWrite 284
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 46.3
165% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 235
201% 295 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Hgst HUS726T6TALE6L4 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: VKGNW460
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 246 256 247 249 250 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 248
Write 250
Mixed 116
SusWrite 249
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.7
9% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
362GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 180 179 182 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 97
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 180
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback