Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	39.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	10.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '21 at 05:02
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 68.1 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 202 67% 122 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 625 61% 498 Pts	64-Core 899 56% 899 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.4% Good	Lighting 91.5 Reflection 88.6 Parallax 76.3 75% 85.5 fps	MRender 64.4 Gravity 79.7 Splatting 72.3 59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hgst HUS726T6TALE6L4 6TB 792 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: VKGAW41G SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 101 107 112 118 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 180 Write 199 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 107 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.5 6% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GTZR CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GTZR 64GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2197, 2197, 2197, 2197 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	67.2% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 24.7 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $50Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $105Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $515