MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 14:29
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 304
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 1,126
99% 840 Pts
64-Core 2,161
134% 2,161 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 124
Parallax 130
105% 127 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 115
Splatting 103
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 468 428 407 470 466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,438
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,064
SusWrite 478
313% 1,414 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 90.3
309% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1321
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 542
590% 990 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 277%
Great: 311%
Samsung MZVLW1T0HMLH-000H1 1TB
438GB free
Firmware: CXY73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 959 1166 1160 1172 1138 1163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,690
Write 1,216
Mixed 921
SusWrite 1,126
277% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 57.6
183% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1236
945% 1,280 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 251%
Great: 287%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
632GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 903 888 899 909 886 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 921
Write 1,025
Mixed 727
SusWrite 1,023
209% 924 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 28.5
143% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 61.8
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 1263
756% 767 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 165%
Great: 310%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GTZR CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GTZR 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 36
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 35.2
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $986
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback