Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory15.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 18:55
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 35
2-Core 62
33% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 229
21% 177 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3225 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.81
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 105
1% 71.1 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 88.1
Splatting 80.5
76% 94.4 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 105%
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3A80) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.40.28.13
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 35.1
20% 57.7 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 22.7
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TDE9X084N 1TB
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41010C22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 1007 1015 1100 1083 957 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,654
Write 1,398
Mixed 1,255
SusWrite 1058
301% 1,341 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 21.4
84% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 209
157% 212 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 166%
Great: 364%
Samsung MZVLW1T0HMLH-000H1 1TB
596GB free
Firmware: CXY70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1057 1047 981 976 960 1027 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1148
Write 1,109
Mixed 666
SusWrite 1,008
221% 983 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 20.2
64% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 219
160% 209 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 137%
Great: 287%
Seagate Expansion+ 5TB
400GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 79 79 76 77 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 82.4
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 76.2
51% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion+ 5TB
353GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 132 134 129 126 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 103
Write 120
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 124
70% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.4
143% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 27.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 16.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 165 48.8" 1280 720 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical 82JQ Builds (Compare 3,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback