Today's hottest deals

Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 05:28
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 262
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 836
79% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 188
95% 134 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 108
Splatting 136
95% 113 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 310 304 292 297 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 441
Mixed 285
SusWrite 304
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 41.5
157% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 241
209% 310 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Addlink SATA SSD 1TB
333GB free
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 461 457 466 470 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 471
Mixed 399
SusWrite 464
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 48.8
165% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 277
214% 293 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
825GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 159 172 175 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 144
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 169
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 107%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
49GB free, PID 6400
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 7.2 29 27 9.2 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 129
Write 92.5
Mixed 102
SusWrite 24.1
109% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 4.3
263% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 30.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 27
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback