Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 14:50
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 168
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 614
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 160
82% 115 fps
MRender 87.9
Gravity 126
Splatting 126
94% 113 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 856 842 851 851 854 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,295
Write 1,949
Mixed 1,546
SusWrite 889
373% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 66.5
220% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 665
487% 643 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 243%
Great: 346%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 124 124 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 129
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 123
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40% Average
Read 67.3
Write 71.4
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 71.9
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40%
Great: 67%
Intenso Rainbow Line 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 4.2 8.2 8.4 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 4.3
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 6.1
8% 5.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback