Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 10:16
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 196
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 361
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Zotac(19DA 1308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.56
5% 6.88 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.48
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 309 317 324 327 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 431
Write 334
Mixed 254
SusWrite 315
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 22.2
78% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 150
122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 80%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 117GB
41GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 22.9
Mixed 25
SusWrite 26.9
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 5.3
923% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 64%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
116GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 39.4
Write 38
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 40.6
52% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 32%
Mass Storage Device 2TB
711GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.9% Very poor
Read 40
Write 38.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 40.5
52% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback