Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.33% Terrible	Memory 4.54 1-Core 38.6 2-Core 74.8 19% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 83.4 8-Core 68.2 10% 75.8 Pts	64-Core 75.1 5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Acer GT500A SATA3 512G 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 61 281 120 127 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 386 Write 148 Mixed 113 SusWrite 129 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 5.6 38% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 90%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 436 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 36GB free, PID 0918 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 83.6 Mixed 6.6 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 27% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 458 9% 458 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	1,003x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	812x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	330x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples	275x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	164x
KIOXIA 256GBKbg40znv256gBench 138%, 13,541 samples	134x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	243x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	199x
HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,524 samples	155x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16