Gigabyte GA-A520I AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520I AC  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 17:07
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 994
100% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,179
73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 78.7
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 95.7
64% 81.9 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 59.9
56% 70 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SE20Q-500G 500GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM52.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 949 951 957 960 959 958 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,034
Write 938
Mixed 926
SusWrite 956
217% 964 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 82.7
297% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 486
425% 613 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 222%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 32.6
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 35.2
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A520I AC Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520I AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback