Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.8 GB free of 13.9922 GB
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 14:50
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel CC150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 170
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 562
52% 434 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T10
Nvidia(10DE 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 3150 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 33.5
24% 42.6 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 46
51% 64.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 117%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 70GB
33GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.4% Good
Read 553
Write 537
Mixed 407
SusWrite 20.9
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 21.9
69% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 315
245% 335 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 83%
Xensrc PVDISK 91GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 26 26 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 549
Write 519
Mixed 464
SusWrite 26.3
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 26.4
83% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 323
241% 317 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 66%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 36GB
34GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 21 21 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.6% Good
Read 572
Write 347
Mixed 408
SusWrite 21.3
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 20.6
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 320
248% 338 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 268GB
249GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 576
Write 339
Mixed 486
SusWrite 20.8
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 23
73% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 314
246% 339 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 90%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 38GB
34GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 21 21 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.5% Good
Read 574
Write 370
Mixed 447
SusWrite 21.1
78% 353 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 22.9
72% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 298
239% 335 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x13GB
1 of 1 slots used
13GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 18.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback