Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 205 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 525 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 450 261 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Apple(106B 0167) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 17.1 12% 17.7 fps	MRender 20.1 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 23.5 16% 19 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0512L 500GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXS6AA0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,120 Write 1,056 Mixed 846 224% 1,007 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 17.9 66% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,052 DQ Write 513 DQ Mixed 648 517% 738 MB/s
Poor: 146% Great: 241%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GB 2,090 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	72.9% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 20.9 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

RAM
0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,090 samples	28x
0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 707 samples	6x
Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GBVMwareBench 69%, 2,863 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16