bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140930
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 08:26
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5667
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 167
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 165
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 98.3
6% 98.3 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 118GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 60 126 133 126 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 458
Write 480
Mixed 209
SusWrite 98
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 2.1
16% 6.77 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 34
44% 75 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback