Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 4,124 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 37.7 1-Core 17.5 2-Core 32.9 20% 29.4 Pts	4-Core 67.3 8-Core 112 11% 89.8 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 07B0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4799 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 34.5 Parallax 2.4 2% 13 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.5 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thnsn51t02duk NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB 2,332 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 873GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 252 85 157 162 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 715 Write 686 Mixed 599 SusWrite 178 122% 544 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 20 63% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 167 125% 168 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 173%
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470 765 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 322 348 359 318 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 288 Write 264 Mixed 280 SusWrite 305 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 20.4 58% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 131 98% 132 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 133%
CHIPSBNK USB 2.0 1GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 6025 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.1 2 2.1 1.9 1 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	4.13% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 1.8 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 1.8 5% 5.47 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.13% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905703-011.A00G 80AD000080AD HMA82GS7AFR8N-UH 0198000080CE 9905703-011.A00G 80AD000080AD HMA82GS7AFR8N-UH 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.3% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 18.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	628x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	557x
Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples	491x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	154x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	153x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	72x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 4,851 samples	237x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 27,567 samples	214x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBUnknownBench 76%, 297 samples	94x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16