Intel NUC8i7HVB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i7HVK
MotherboardIntel NUC8i7HVB  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 11:33
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8809G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 610
59% 487 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Intel(8086 2073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20.01.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 62.9
38% 63.8 fps
MRender 54.7
Gravity 41
Splatting 47
39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 1639 1570 1137 1126 1108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 1,931
Mixed 1,388
SusWrite 1,317
397% 1,777 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 64.9
215% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1067
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 250
269% 477 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 272%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
144GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 396 400 388 378 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 348
Write 317
Mixed 282
SusWrite 381
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 26
91% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 120
90% 120 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
957GB free
Firmware: RVT2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 202 205 224 226 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 356
Write 291
Mixed 283
SusWrite 214
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 24.3
86% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 117
86% 112 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 90%
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RVT2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 201 205 224 226 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 359
Write 297
Mixed 262
SusWrite 214
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 22.5
78% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 114
82% 107 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 90%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB
315GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 201 202 156 157 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 348
Write 350
Mixed 258
SusWrite 179
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 22.7
81% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 122
85% 108 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8i7HVB Builds (Compare 727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel NUC8i7HVB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback