Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 22:54
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 106
48% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 297
29% 240 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 1.5
1% 14.6 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TRO-2280-500-PRO 500GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 3.1 2.1 160 30 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 438
Write 339
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 87.3
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.9
25% 7.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 0.6
16% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 77%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
253GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1551 1099 592 581 585 609 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,128
Write 1,607
Mixed 1,023
SusWrite 836
311% 1,398 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 66.4
214% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 534
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 496
376% 505 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 226%
Great: 340%
WD 1200BEVExternal 120GB
26GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 37 36 36 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 4.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 36.6
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.5% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $42
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback