Asus MAXIMUS VIII FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 04:06
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 694
69% 562 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.2% Poor
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 12.2
8% 13.9 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 97.4
Splatting 42.5
53% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 311 311 305 306 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,594
Write 386
Mixed 504
SusWrite 305
152% 697 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 64.7
242% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,227
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 739
579% 820 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 195%
Great: 353%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
467GB free
Firmware: N100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 311 317 320 318 320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 337
Write 356
Mixed 256
SusWrite 316
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 37.3
124% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 165
133% 186 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
486GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 49 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 61
Write 54.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 49.5
39% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 48%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 120 117 117 121 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 55.3
Write 81.7
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 117
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
133% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 128%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
85GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 82.3
Write 47.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 96.3
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 123%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 198 203 204 201 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 140
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 201
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.7
766% 6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 120%
Great: 137%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 181 182 182 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 187
Write 186
Mixed 122
SusWrite 181
228% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 31.3
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII FORMULA Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $736
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback