Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 13:08
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 189
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 381
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 99 94 116 101 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65% Good
Read 332
Write 105
Mixed 146
SusWrite 156
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 30.1
106% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 208
158% 210 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 110 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 124
Write 111
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 112
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 67%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 40
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 40.5
52% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback