Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '17 at 12:26
Run Duration964 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 669
72% 572 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2877 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 184
Parallax 162
130% 168 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 140
Splatting 103
95% 118 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
72GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 508
Write 351
Mixed 360
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 20.2
90% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 40.7
46% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 513
Write 275
Mixed 281
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 18.7
88% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 45.3
56% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 110%
OCZ AGILITY3 480GB
18GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 257
Write 118
Mixed 128
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 9.61
4K Mixed 10.8
47% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 42.1
DQ Mixed 27.4
32% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 41%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
56GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 112
Write 60.3
Mixed 111
72% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.47
134% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 80%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
150GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 40.8
Mixed 12.5
37% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.16
71% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 61%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
102GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 40.6
Mixed 7.13
34% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.21
77% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EURX-64WRWY0 4TB
86GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 39.2
Mixed 38.4
50% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.24
90% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 42%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-22YGA0 500GB
18GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.18% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 1.15
Mixed 2.68
7% 8.24 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.29
20% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.1
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $774
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback