Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 706
68% 559 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 78.3
0% 45.3 fps
MRender 57.1
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 42.8
43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00R480GB 480GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 110 20 108 24 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 230
Write 101
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 68.1
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 8.9
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 18.5
16% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 93%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
861GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 148 111 129 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 135
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 135
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 89%
USB Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.4 7.4 7.3 8.1 8.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.66% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 7.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.7
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FD CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback