Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboard PC
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200505
Uptime20.8 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455E
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 30.8
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 69.2
28% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 109
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ShanDianZhe-256GB 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1116A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 73 84 47 31 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.5% Very poor
Read 85.8
Write 88.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 62.3
15% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 1.1
26% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 95.5
DQ Write 93.5
DQ Mixed 0.3
26% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 123456789012345678 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 4.7
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback