Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory90.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 21:54
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 69.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 263
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 1,013
90% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,995
124% 1,995 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 82.7%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Apple(106B 0212) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 128
Parallax 235
96% 160 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 136
Splatting 85.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 93.4%
 Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
482GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2008 2079 2126 1882 1852 1811 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Samsung M393A4K40DB2-CVF 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Samsung M393A4K40DB2-CVF 95GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 32767, 8192, 8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
132% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 68.4
MC Mixed 46.7
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 9.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

CPU
Xeon W-3245IntelBench 84%, 92 samples8x
Xeon W-3223IntelBench 79%, 91 samples7x
Xeon W-3235IntelBench 84%, 50 samples4x
GPU
Radeon Pro 580XAMDBench 47%, 31 samples5x
Radeon Pro W5700XAMDBench 100%, 19 samples3x
RX Vega-64AMD  $400Bench 87%, 91,676 samples3x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples4x
SM1024G PCIe 1TBAppleBench 169%, 404 samples2x
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TBBench 360%, 6,289 samples2x
RAM
9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 ... 96GBMicronBench 155%, 5 samples4x
HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 4x8GBHynixBench 84%, 118 samples3x
HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM 6x16GBHynixBench 123%, 25 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback