Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 76.3 2-Core 146 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 252 35% 257 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E193) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.57% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 6 Parallax 5.7 5% 5.87 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 5 4% 5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.57% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 168 168 167 168 169 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.7% Above average	Read 249 Write 154 Mixed 184 SusWrite 168 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 33.1 108% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 76.9 DQ Mixed 51.6 41% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 124%
Inateck ASM1153E 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 203GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.5% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 27.2 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 28.1 22% 29 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 5.2 969% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $159

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16