Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160127
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 05:47
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 695
75% 596 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 2075) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 197
Parallax 126
117% 155 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
114% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 471 388 450 438 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 477
Mixed 392
SusWrite 442
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 63.6
218% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
110GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 482 477 482 483 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 479
Mixed 398
SusWrite 480
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 66.6
225% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
622GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 482 477 482 483 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 480
Mixed 435
SusWrite 481
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 68.8
232% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 138%
Great: 133%
Seagate BUP RD 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 135 134 134 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 102
Write 131
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 133
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback