Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 11:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 105
47% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 199
19% 157 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.14501.18003
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 12.2
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 8.9
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 367 373 409 397 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 441
Write 373
Mixed 364
SusWrite 371
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 19.3
97% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 96.6
107% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
247GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 124 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 148
Write 129
Mixed 70
SusWrite 123
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2666 CL19 8GB DDR4-2666 C19 8GB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.7
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback