Today's hottest deals

Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 05:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 184
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 360
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN-mSATAQ3-120 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 152 82 117 81 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 343
Write 301
Mixed 276
SusWrite 134
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 1
60% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 65.2
DQ Write 42.3
DQ Mixed 16.5
22% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6630_CM6730_CM6830. Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback