Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 203
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 520
53% 429 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tigo 1TB 1TB
923GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T190517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 192 192 193 190 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 347
Write 343
Mixed 316
SusWrite 189
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 29.1
105% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 254%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
48GB free
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 191 192 193 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 353
Write 281
Mixed 254
SusWrite 189
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 31.4
104% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 132
121% 186 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback