Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16U7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL65 Leopard 10SFSK
MotherboardMSI MS-16U7  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200520
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 14:32
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 134
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 842
82% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12B8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 140
Parallax 8.3
5% 51.6 fps
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 12.9
9% 10 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1051 587 369 368 360 368 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 1,445
Mixed 1,231
SusWrite 517
260% 1,160 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 66.9
231% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,193
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 656
560% 835 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 202%
Great: 213%
KSM256 256GB
68GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 169 83 67 52 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 377
Write 348
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 131
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 1.2
38% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 46.5
DQ Mixed 19.6
32% 63.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16U7 Builds (Compare 2,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16U7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback