Monster TULPAR T7 V19.7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.7  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.7
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime26.5 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 06:29
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 790
74% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,230
76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 108B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 113
Parallax 7.9
5% 42.6 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2510
Write 2,055
Mixed 1,785
470% 2,117 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 74
243% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 768
590% 812 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.7 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback