Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5218R
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 230
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 387
58% 418 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 86GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 130 127 114 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 4.8
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback