Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
MotherboardRed RHEL-AV
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5320
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 209
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 360
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A16-2B
Nvidia(10DE 159E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 38.5
35% 39.3 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 30.8
29% 36 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 86GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 97 126 100 113 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 234
Write 145
Mixed 195
SusWrite 111
128% 171 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 4.4
803% 5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 82.9
MC Mixed 38.6
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 121%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback