Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
MotherboardRed RHEL-AV
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 08:53
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5320
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30% Below average
Memory 23.2
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 97.6
26% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 191
28% 203 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A16-1B
Nvidia(10DE 159D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 35.2
Parallax 38.5
35% 38.7 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 30
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 86GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 64 60 59 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 110
Write 82
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 60.1
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.6
274% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 4.7
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 406
10% 406 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 33 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback