Today's hottest deals

Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 05:41
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 802
74% 616 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 90.9
82% 95.9 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 76.4
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 227 240 243 239 239 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 442
Write 438
Mixed 361
SusWrite 237
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 162
145% 211 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 101%
Amd-raid SanDisk Ultra II 240GB
57GB free
Firmware: X412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 189 185 192 191 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.5% Above average
Read 430
Write 193
Mixed 190
SusWrite 183
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 19.1
73% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 74.3
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 76.2
80% 127 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
Amd-raid Array 2 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 259 267 269 266 268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 267
Write 269
Mixed 156
SusWrite 265
176% 239 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.4
320% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 153%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 30
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $152Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback